Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41727042›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Objective Quality Assessment for Precision Functional MRI Data.

Charles J Lynch, Megan Chang, Immanuel Elbau, Evan M Gordon, Timothy O Laumann, Jingnan Du, Zach Ladwig, Maximilian Lueckel, Diana C Perez, Indira Summerville and 26 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Charles J Lynch
Megan Chang
Immanuel Elbau
Evan M Gordon
Timothy O Laumann
Jingnan Du
Zach Ladwig
Maximilian LueckelORCID 0000-0002-5568-5815
Diana C Perez
Indira Summerville
Jolene Chou
Megan Johnson
Claire Ho
Nicola Manfredi
Parsa Nilchian
Nili Solomonov
Eric Goldwaser
Tommy Ng
Cesar Caballero-Gaudes
Jonathan Downar
Fidel Vila-RodriguezORCID 0000-0002-8273-8820
Elizabeth Gregory
Zafiris J Daskalakis
Daniel M BlumbergerORCID 0000-0002-8422-5818
Kendrick Kay
Derrick Buchanan
Mahendra T Bhati
Jacqueline ClaussORCID 0000-0002-0532-6726
Benjamin Zebley
Lindsay W Victoria
Jonathan D Power
Logan Grosenick
Faith M Gunning
Conor Liston

Funding

Precision Functional Mapping in Treatment-Resistant DepressionR00MH129616 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TIMOTHY OTTO LAUMANN · 2024 to 2026
$747k
NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH129616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precision functional mapping (PFM) enables individual-level characterization of brain network organization but requires substantially more and higher-quality fMRI data than is standard. Despite its growing use, objective criteria for data sufficiency and quality needed to ensure interpretable and replicable individual-level results remain unclear. Here, we introduce the Network Similarity Index (NSI), an objective measure of the extent to which functional connectivity (FC) patterns in an individual dataset express the large-scale network structure required for PFM. NSI captures the integrity of low-spatial-frequency, coherent network organization and denoising fidelity, and aligns closely with blinded expert assessments of PFM usability. NSI also accounts for variability in the rate at which FC becomes reliable across individuals. Here, we provide an open-source framework for NSI-based data quality evaluation and models for linking NSI values with expert-judged PFM suitability. This framework can also inform expected returns from additional data collection, enabling principled decisions about data sufficiency and replication in precision fMRI research.

Identifiers

PMID41727042
PMCPMC12918819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.