ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
PRECISE TBI Model Catalog: Increasing Accessibility and Reproducibility in TBI research.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preclinical traumatic brain injury (TBI) research relies on experimental models that vary by mechanism, parameters, surgical procedures, species, strains, and ages, to name a few. While these models are crucial for understanding injury mechanisms and testing therapies, the progress in translating this knowledge to the clinic has been limited. This is in part due to fragmented resources and inconsistent reporting of critical variables. Here, we introduce the PRECISE-TBI model catalog, a centralized, queryable resource that consolidates metadata from published studies. The catalog integrates curated annotations from more than 450 papers, including details such as age, sex, strain, model type, device, and injury parameters. Where available, entries are also linked to protocols and datasets to enhance transparency and reproducibility. The Model Catalog serves as a living resource that enables cross-study comparison, identifies gaps in reporting, and connects the literature to datasets, protocols, device information, and other relevant resources. Analysis of the initial catalog entries revealed gaps in the reporting of device, age, and weight. In contrast, the reporting of sex improved over time, with over 90% of recent studies within the catalog papers reporting sex. Strain was also reported in most studies, with consistent reporting of specificity, especially for the C57 mice substrain. We expect the Model Catalog to serve as a valuable tool to enhance study design and reproducibility in preclinical TBI research while advancing FAIR data principles in the TBI field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.