ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Reproducible and predictable reorganization of place fields driven by grid subfield rate changes.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how the brain constructs stable yet flexible maps of space remains a central challenge in neuroscience. Place cells in the hippocampus fire at specific locations in a given environment, but reorganize completely upon introduction to another environment in a process called remapping. The medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) provides a major cortical input to the hippocampus, and the spatially periodic firing patterns of its grid cells are thought to contribute to place field formation. We previously showed that chemogenetic depolarization of MEC layer II stellate cells selectively altered firing rates within individual grid cell subfields, impaired spatial memory, and induced a form of reversible place cell remapping that we called artificial remapping. However, it remains unclear whether artificial remapping reflects a reproducible and stable mapping from entorhinal inputs to place cell outputs or a random reorganization of place fields. To explore the transfer of information between MEC and hippocampus, we repeated this chemogenetic manipulation on consecutive days and found that stimulating the same stellate cells produced similar changes in both grid subfield rates and place field locations. Using both experimental and simulated data, we show that baseline place cell activity patterns could be used to predict place field locations following the manipulation. These findings provide direct evidence for consistent input-output relationships in the entorhinal-hippocampal system and point to a central role for grid subfield rate changes in the reorganization of hippocampal spatial representations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.