ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Interoception Network in the Rat Brain.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The brain is never truly at rest. Even in the absence of external stimuli or cognitive tasks, the central nervous system continuously receives peripheral signals from visceral organs, such as the heart, lungs, and stomach, and sends motor commands to regulate organ physiology. This bidirectional brain-body interaction, also known as interoception, engages neural pathways via a hierarchical set of brain regions, including the nucleus of the solitary tract, hypothalamus, paraventricular nuclei of the thalamus, insular cortex, and anterior cingulate cortex, among others. However, it is largely unclear to what extent interoceptive signaling shapes ongoing fluctuations and correlations of brain activity. To address this question, we recorded resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from 34 anesthetized rats, examined intrinsic correlations (or functional connectivity), and tested their dependence on the body's digestive state and peripheral nerve integrity. We observed reciprocal functional connectivity among brain regions situated along established interoceptive pathways, revealing a cohesive network, which we refer to as the interoception network. This network showed stronger functional connectivity in the fed condition (digestive phase) compared to the fasted condition (inter-digestive phase), suggesting its dependence on distinct states of gastrointestinal interoception without apparent cardiac or respiratory confounds. Importantly, we found that the interoception network relied on the integrity of the vagus nerve, a primary component of the peripheral nervous system for visceral sensation and parasympathetic control. When vagal signaling was surgically severed by bilateral cervical vagotomy, functional connectivity within the interoception network was notably reduced. Given these findings, we conclude that resting state functional connectivity is not sustained by the central nervous system alone, but relies on interoceptive signaling mediated through peripheral nerves that connect the brain and viscera.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.