ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Unsupervised Representation Learning Generates Differentiable Neurophysiological Profiles.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent neuroimaging research has shown that human brain activity expresses stable, individual-specific features that persist over months to years, defining neurophysiological profiles. Current model-based profiling relies on labeled data and supervised learning, leaving open whether they exploit idiosyncratic artifacts or genuine biology. We introduce a participant-agnostic autoencoder framework to derive differentiable profiles from brief segments of resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG). Despite an unsupervised objective, discriminative profiles emerged naturally from the learned latent space, outperforming model-free and model-based baselines in participant differentiation. Reliable differentiation was achieved using recordings as short as 14 s, generalized across recording sessions, and remained robust without anatomical information. Beyond differentiation, learned profiles predicted age more accurately than baselines, and the decoder enabled perturbation-based sensitivity analyses directly in spectral and connectivity spaces. These results establish participant-agnostic modeling as a principled and interpretable framework for neurophysiological profiling that generalizes across sessions while preserving sensitivity to biologically relevant individual differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.