ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Improving Protein Structure Prediction Using Integrative Cryo-EM and Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry Modeling.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteins perform essential roles across nearly all cellular processes, and accurate three-dimensional structures remain critical for elucidating structure-function relationships and studies on drug discovery. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), X-ray crystallography, and nuclear magnetic resonance can provide detailed structural information. However, for many proteins, structural information is available only as lower-resolution experimental data or sparse data. Such information is more difficult to translate into accurate atomic coordinates; a common example is low-resolution cryo-EM density maps. In parallel, mass spectrometry-based methods, including ion mobility (IM-MS), offer rapid, broadly applicable structural descriptors such as collisional cross section (CCS), a global measure of molecular shape and size, but CCS values also do not provide atomistic detail. Here we present CRIM (cryo-EM + IM-MS), an integrative Rosetta scoring function that combines low-resolution cryo-EM density information with IM-MS derived CCS as restraints to improve monomeric protein structure prediction. CRIM incorporates the Rosetta REF2015 (RS) energy with a CCS agreement penalty (computed via PARCS) and an electron-density agreement term (elec_dens_fast). We tested CRIM on an ideal dataset of 60 monomeric proteins using simulated CCS values and density maps. Across the ideal dataset, the CRIM score function improved or maintained prediction quality for many targets, reducing the mean RMSD from 3.65 Å (RS) to 2.90 Å and increasing the mean TM-score from 0.88 to 0.90. Furthermore, an experimental benchmark dataset of 54 proteins was curated to include either experimental cryo-EM maps or published CCS values. On the experimental dataset, CRIM similarly improved model selection, lowering the mean RMSD from 6.65 Å to 4.38 Å and raising the mean TM-score from 0.73 to 0.79. In comparison to AlphaFold3 predictions, CRIM frequently yielded competitive predictions and was able to substantially outperform AlphaFold3 for select difficult targets where sparse experimental restraints provide strong discriminatory power. The CRIM score function is freely available within the Rosetta software suite and provides a practical framework for leveraging complementary IM-MS and cryo-EM data to improve monomeric protein structure prediction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.