ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Interventions targeting identity in adults with psychosis, severe mental illness, brain injury, or intellectual disability: a transdiagnostic scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Despite the extensive literature linking identity experiences with Severe Mental Illness (SMI), little is known about interventions specifically addressing identity in this population. This scoping review aims to explore the available literature on identity interventions whilst adopting a transdiagnostic approach. We provide an overview of intervention studies targeting identity or self-concept in individuals with psychotic spectrum disorders or severe mental illness (SMI), acquired brain injury (ABI), or intellectual disability (ID). Methods: A search was conducted across six databases for articles up to November 2025. Eligible studies were peer-reviewed and evaluated interventions for individuals with SMI, ABI, or ID. These interventions either focused upon identity or assessed outcomes specifically related to identity. Case studies, theoretical papers, and reviews were excluded. Both qualitative and quantitative data were summarized, emphasizing study approaches, intervention approaches, theoretical frameworks, outcomes and recommendations for future studies. Results: A total of 35 studies were identified: 16 on SMI/psychosis, 17 on ABI, and 2 on ID. There was substantial heterogeneity across interventions. Interventions aimed to help individuals become more positive, develop complex identities, adjust to illness, reconstruct integrated self-narratives, and experience an empowered (social) identity. Participants learned through experience, social connection, self-reflection, and narrative- and cognitive restructuring. Discussion: This review identifies several promising intervention elements for future research, as discussed in the paper. However, considering the limited number of studies, their heterogeneity, and the exploratory nature of this research, further investigation is required to build upon and expand existing approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.