ArticleBrain & spine2026
Extradural hematoma management: A case-control study with historical controls reassessing the 'zero mortality' goal.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Extradural hematoma (EDH) remains a significant cause of mortality following traumatic brain injury (TBI), although fatality rates have declined. This study examines whether improvements in a regional trauma and neurosurgical care system over four decades have enabled the achievement of the long-standing goal of "zero mortality" in surgically treated EDH. Research question: Has the evolution of a regional trauma and neurosurgical care system over four decades reduced mortality and moved towards the 'zero mortality' goal in surgically treated extradural hematomas? Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent surgery for EDH at our institution between 2011 and 2021. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were collected and compared in a case-control design with a historical cohort treated at the same center in the early 1980s, when the "zero mortality" concept was first proposed. Results: Among 85 contemporary cases, most patients were aged 41-61 years (previously 11-20), and falls were the leading cause of injury (55% vs. 50% due to road traffic accidents; p = 0.007). Direct presentations increased (65% vs. 33%; p < 0.001), and 96% arrived within 6 h (vs. 65%; p < 0.001). Surgery within 6 h occurred in 68% of cases. Referred patients experienced significantly longer delays. Craniotomy was performed in 94% of cases. In-hospital mortality was 2.4% (vs. 4.7%). Discussion and conclusions: Although system-wide improvements have reduced mortality, the "zero mortality" target remains unmet. Delays in referral and triage continue to pose challenges, particularly in complex or rapidly evolving cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.