ArticleACS omega2026
Detection of Diuretics Contamination in Whey Protein-Based Dietary Supplements.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whey protein dietary supplements (WPDS) are widely used by athletes at all levels to improve recovery between training sessions and competitions. The increasing number of reported cases of athletes who consumed these products and subsequently tested positive in antidoping tests has raised concerns that such products may contain undeclared substances. Diuretics are among the most common adulterants found in dietary supplements, and the presence of any amount of these substances in urine or blood samples is classified as doping. This study aimed to develop a reliable method using high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection (HPLC-UV) to simultaneously detect the presence of the diuretics chlorothiazide, hydrochlorothiazide, furosemide, amiloride, and chlorthalidone in WPDS. A simple, selective, precise, and accurate method was validated according to ANVISA, FDA, and forensic toxicology guidelines using a C8 column, a 100 mM ammonium acetate buffer, and an acetonitrile mobile phase in a gradient system, with UV detection at 276 nm. The method was applied to the analysis of 21 commercial WPDS samples, and 42.9% tested positive for at least one of the investigated diuretics. Furosemide was the most frequently detected diuretic found in 28.8% (0.20-1.82 mg/g of WPDS) of all analyzed samples, followed by hydrochlorothiazide, detected in 19.0% (0.25-1.40 mg/g of WPDS). These results highlight the importance of screening for adulterants in WPDS before consumption to ensure proper quality control, protect consumer safety, and prevent unintentional doping cases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.