Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41726725›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Detection of Diuretics Contamination in Whey Protein-Based Dietary Supplements.

Inélia Maria Franskoviaki, Pâmela Cristina Lukasewicz Ferreira, Vanessa Klimkowski Argoud, Pedro Eduardo Froelich, Aline Rigon Zimmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inélia Maria FranskoviakiGraduate Program of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), 2752 Ipiranga Avenue, 90610-000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Pâmela Cristina Lukasewicz FerreiraGraduate Program of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), 2752 Ipiranga Avenue, 90610-000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Vanessa Klimkowski ArgoudGraduate Program of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), 2752 Ipiranga Avenue, 90610-000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Pedro Eduardo FroelichGraduate Program of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), 2752 Ipiranga Avenue, 90610-000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Aline Rigon ZimmerGraduate Program of Pharmaceutical Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), 2752 Ipiranga Avenue, 90610-000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8309-7068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whey protein dietary supplements (WPDS) are widely used by athletes at all levels to improve recovery between training sessions and competitions. The increasing number of reported cases of athletes who consumed these products and subsequently tested positive in antidoping tests has raised concerns that such products may contain undeclared substances. Diuretics are among the most common adulterants found in dietary supplements, and the presence of any amount of these substances in urine or blood samples is classified as doping. This study aimed to develop a reliable method using high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection (HPLC-UV) to simultaneously detect the presence of the diuretics chlorothiazide, hydrochlorothiazide, furosemide, amiloride, and chlorthalidone in WPDS. A simple, selective, precise, and accurate method was validated according to ANVISA, FDA, and forensic toxicology guidelines using a C8 column, a 100 mM ammonium acetate buffer, and an acetonitrile mobile phase in a gradient system, with UV detection at 276 nm. The method was applied to the analysis of 21 commercial WPDS samples, and 42.9% tested positive for at least one of the investigated diuretics. Furosemide was the most frequently detected diuretic found in 28.8% (0.20-1.82 mg/g of WPDS) of all analyzed samples, followed by hydrochlorothiazide, detected in 19.0% (0.25-1.40 mg/g of WPDS). These results highlight the importance of screening for adulterants in WPDS before consumption to ensure proper quality control, protect consumer safety, and prevent unintentional doping cases.

Identifiers

PMID41726725
PMCPMC12917619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.