Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41726609›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Maria E Rigoni, Sergio R de Lazaro, Lucas Stori de Lara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria E RigoniDepartment of Chemistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Av. Carlos Cavalcanti, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa 4748, Brazil.
Sergio R de LazaroDepartment of Chemistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Av. Carlos Cavalcanti, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa 4748, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9753-7936
Lucas Stori de LaraDepartment of Physics, State University of Ponta Grossa, Av. Carlos Cavalcanti, Uvaranas, Ponta Grossa 4748, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1178-0615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultraviolet radiation is the leading cause of skin damage, such as burns, premature aging, and the development of skin cancer. Organic sunscreens are widely used in the cosmetics industry due to their ability to absorb ultraviolet radiation and dissipate it as heat. These compounds can be susceptible to photochemical instability, which compromises their effectiveness over time and also poses environmental risks, particularly in aquatic ecosystems. This study investigated the electronic properties, absorption spectra, and solvent effects of five widely used organic UV filters: Avobenzone, Homosalate, Octisalate, Octocrylene, and Bemotrizinol. The analyses were performed through DFT and TD-DFT calculations. Solvent effects were evaluated using an implicit solvent model and complemented by molecular dynamics simulations in an aqueous environment.

Identifiers

PMID41726609
PMCPMC12917627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.