ReviewACS omega2026
Status of Human-Made Radioactive Materials in a Biophysical Constrained World.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discovery of nuclear fission nearly a century ago not only caused the production of significant quantities of radioactive materials, but also purposefully brought naturally occurring radioactive substances from the Earth's crust to the surface through mining. The use of these materials, particularly in nuclear weapons, has profoundly influenced our understanding of the Earth system, driven by the military's need to study the effects of nuclear explosions. This introduced the alarming possibility of irreversible, severe consequences on a global scale within a very short time frame. Despite their critical significance, radioactive materials are scarcely addressed within the Planetary Boundaries framework. This oversight may stem from the challenge of defining control variables or safe operating spaces for the two most consequential release pathways: nuclear power plant accidents and nuclear explosions. Applying the precautionary principle in this context would advocate for a world free of nuclear weapons and a cautious, well-considered approach to the use of nuclear energy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.