Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41726534›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

From Chronic Health Condition to Disability Identity: Opportunities for Health Informatics Engagement.

Emma J McDonnell, Wanda Pratt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emma J McDonnellUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Wanda PrattUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Funding

University of Washington Biomedical Informatics and Data Science Research Training ProgramT15LM007442 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JOHN H. GENNARI, Andrea L. Hartzler · 2002 to 2026
$19.6M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Of the millions of Americans with chronic health conditions (CHCs), a growing number are coming to identify as disabled due to their CHCs. Their definition of disability differs substantially from how health informatics has traditionally thought about disability and CHCs. Rather than seeing disability as worsening CHCs that ought to be prevented, disability community definitions see disability as a form of social difference, akin to race and gender. To understand the impact of this perspective on disability on people with CHCs, we interviewed 15 participants who identify as disabled due to their CHCs. We found that it was often difficult to develop a disability identity, but doing so had significant benefits: greater self-acceptance, accessibility, and community. We conclude by identifying opportunities for health informatics to enable more people with CHCs to develop and benefit from a disability identity.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseasePersons with DisabilitiesSelf ConceptAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMedical InformaticsMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41726534
PMCPMC12919619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.