ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Detecting Reference Errors in Scientific Literature with Large Language Models.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI for scientific integrity: detecting ethical breaches, errors, and misconduct in manuscripts.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reference errors, such as citation and quotation errors, are common in scientific papers. Such errors can result in the propagation of inaccurate information, but are difficult and time-consuming to detect, posing a significant threat to the integrity of scientific literature. To support automatic detection of reference errors, we evaluated the ability of large language models in OpenAI's GPT family to detect quotation errors. Specifically, we prepared an expert-annotated, general-domain dataset of statement-reference pairs from journal articles, one-third of which is in biomedicine. Large language models were evaluated in different settings with varying amounts of reference information provided by retrieval augmentation. Results showed that large language models are able to detect erroneous citations with limited context and without fine-tuning. This study contributes to the growing literature that seeks to utilize artificial intelligence to assist in the writing, reviewing, and publishing of scientific papers as well as grounding of language model responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726520PMC12919499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.