ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Automated Image Registration Method for In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of the Corneal Sub-basal Nerve Plexus.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) assesses corneal innervation in the sub-basal nerve plexus but is typically quantified manually from a single z-scan, limiting biomarker extrapolation for diagnosing limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). We developed an automated 3D reconstruction method of IVCM image volumes to improve sub-basal nerve density quantification. Our dataset comprised 99 IVCM stacks from 63 LSCD eyes (51 patients) and 23 stacks from 15 normal eyes. We designed an image registration algorithm combining phase correlation and homography transformation, which achieved a pairwise image correlation of 0.69 and mutual information of 0.60, significantly outperforming manual registration (0.60 and 0.43, respectively; p<0.001). Validation on an independent dataset of 325 volume scans from 24 eyes of 12 unilateral, severe LSCD patients yielded a correlation of 0.75 and MI of 0.76. This method enhances sequential IVCM scan alignment and supports more accurate, reproducible 3D evaluation of LSC biomarkers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726503PMC12919528What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.