Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41726490›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

Leveraging multi-source data to resolve inconsistency across pharmacogenomic datasets in drug sensitivity prediction.

Xiaodi Li, Trisha Das, Kritib Bhattarai, Sivaraman Rajaganapathy, Vincent C Buchner, Yanshan Wang, Chang Su, Lichao Sun, Liewei Wang, James R Cerhan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaodi LiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Trisha DasDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kritib BhattaraiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sivaraman RajaganapathyDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Vincent C BuchnerDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yanshan WangDepartment of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Chang SuDepartment of Health Service Administration and Policy, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lichao SunDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Liewei WangDepartment of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
James R CerhanDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nansu ZongDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

BOND: Benchmarking based on heterogeneous biOmedical Network and Deep learning novel drug-target associationsR00GM135488 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ZONG, NANSU · 2021 to 2023
$747k
NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM135488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers have developed pharmacogenomics datasets for various purposes, such as biomarker identification, yet drug response prediction models often underperform due to dataset inconsistencies. These variations arise from inter-tumoral heterogeneity, experimental conditions, and cell subtype complexity, limiting model generalizability. To address this, we propose a computational model based on Aggregated Learning (AL) to enhance drug response prediction by learning from inconsistencies across multiple datasets. Our model minimizes discrepancies by training on overlapping inconsistent data points from three pharmacogenomic datasets-CCLE, GDSC2, and gCSI. Compared to four baseline methods-Selecting Better (SB), Result Average (RA), Combining Data (CD), and Model Average (MA)-our approach achieved superior performance with lower Mean Absolute Error (MAE) scores: 0.090 (CCLE-GDSC), 0.096 (CCLE-gCSI), and 0.081 (GDSC-gCSI). These results demonstrate that addressing inconsistencies enhances prediction accuracy and generalizability, making our model a promising solution for robust drug response predictions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPharmacogeneticsDatasets as TopicHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning Models

Identifiers

PMID41726490
PMCPMC12919631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.