Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41726478›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

Mapping Documentation Burden: Analyzing Centrality and Clusters among Flowsheet Measures and Templates Through Network Analysis.

Pinyue Wang, Amy Finnegan, Po-Yin Yen, Sarah C Rossetti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pinyue WangColumbia University, Department of Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY.
Amy FinneganIntraHealth International, Chapel Hill, NC.
Po-Yin YenInstitute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, MO.
Sarah C RossettiColumbia University, Department of Biomedical Informatics, New York, NY.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS028454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study applied network analysis (NA) to identify documentation burden in nursing flowsheets, quantifying and visualizing the interconnectedness of nursing flowsheet templates and measures. By analyzing centrality metrics and edge weights, we highlighted an outdated flowsheet structure and the need for a modern data structure. Using centrality metrics, we identified key templates and measures contributing to documentation burden, including highly repetitive nodes, central hubs, and intermediary nodes that facilitated communication in the network. Our findings showed that certain templates and measures exhibited consistently high centralities across multiple metrics, indicating opportunities for streamlining documentation structures. We also analyzed the communities in both networks to reveal the functional clusters of template and measure documentation. These insights provided a data-driven approach to understand documentation burden and inform opportunities to optimize documentation structures, particularly with increasing ambient technology integrations.

Indexed as

DocumentationNursing RecordsCluster Analysis

Identifiers

PMID41726478
PMCPMC12919536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.