ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Trustworthy and Uncertainty-Aware AI for Predicting Respiratory Complications Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) are among the fastest-growing surgeries in the United States, where they are designed to restore mobility and improve quality of life in individuals with joint disorders. Despite their benefits, these procedures may carry significant risks, including, but not limited to, major respiratory complications. Prompt identification of patients at increased risk is essential for optimizing preoperative treatment, reducing adverse outcomes, and increasing patient safety. In this study, we propose an uncertainty-aware and trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) framework to predict the likelihood of major respiratory complications, including unplanned intubation, failure to wean from ventilation, and postoperative pneumonia occurring during the index hospitalization and within 30 days following both primary and revision THA and TKA procedures. Unlike traditional risk models, our framework explicitly quantifies prediction uncertainty while maintaining high interpretability, enabling proactive and personalized clinical interventions. We assessed four machine learning (ML) models, including Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), Logistic Regression (LR), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to predict three postoperative respiratory outcomes. The ML models demonstrated strong predictive performance, with RF achieving an F1-score of 0.87 for respiratory complications in THA, while ANNs outperformed other models in TKA, also attaining an F1-score of 0.87.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726476PMC12919624What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.