ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Model Quality in AI-based Bruise Detection: Rethinking IoU and Confidence Thresholds.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based object detection models, like YOLO and Faster R-CNN, depend heavily on the Intersection over Union (IoU) and confidence thresholds to evaluate model performance. However, fixed thresholds can be biased and may have a disparate effect across subpopulations, even when traditional performance metrics suggest strong model performance. This paper examines how varying IoU and confidence thresholds affect standard evaluation metrics such as precision, recall, F1-score, and mean Average Precision (mAP) along with their effect on five widely used fairness metrics - Demographic Parity, Equalized Odds, Equality of Opportunity, Accuracy Equality, and Disparate Impact. This study evaluated a dataset of bruise images under natural and alternative light sources and found that fairness and performance trade-offs can be mitigated by selecting intermediate threshold values rather than fixed extremes. In addition, the results highlight the need for dynamical optimization of thresholds to achieve both, high model performance and fairness, in AI-driven bruise detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726463PMC12919542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.