ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Towards Inpatient Discharge Summary Automation via Large Language Models: A Multidimensional Evaluation with a HIPAA-Compliant Instance of GPT-4o and Clinical Expert Assessment.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The daily dose: Early usability of an LLM tool for patient summaries and trial matching in radiation oncology.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential to automate clinical documentation tasks that may reduce clinician burden, such as generation of hospital discharge summaries. Prior research used older LLMs and limited data, raising concerns about fabrications and omissions. In this study, we evaluated the automatic generation of inpatient Internal Medicine discharge summaries using a HIPAA-compliant Microsoft Azure instance of OpenAI's GPT-4o. Both human-written and AI-generated discharge summaries were scored by Internal Medicine hospital faculty for quality, readability/conciseness, factuality and completeness, presence of hallucinations/omissions and their impact on safety, and compared with the actual discharge summaries. Our results showed that the AI-generated discharge summaries significantly outperformed actual human written summaries in both quality and readability/conciseness and were comparable to humans in factuality and completeness, with a minimal cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726458PMC12919585What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.