SynthesisAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Computational Use of Patient-Provider Secure Messaging Data to Achieve Better Clinical Efficiency and Quality of Communication: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A scoping review of studies on secure messaging through patient portals: persistent challenges and potential solutions.npj health systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Secure messaging (SM) between patients and providers has seen increasing adoption over the past decade, prompting development of computational methods to enable automation and research to enhance clinical efficiency and quality of communication. Through a systematic review, we examined the extant literature to investigate how previous studies had applied computational analyses to SM data. After screening 1,374 papers, we identified 19 relevant studies published between 2017 and 2024, most of which focused on applications for streamlining clinical workflows, facilitating early disease detection, supporting personalized decision making, and enhancing patient health literacy. Among the computational methods used, BERT was consistently shown to deliver best performance. However, all existing studies were constrained by small-size datasets and limited healthcare settings, leading to inadequate validation and poor generalizability. The results of this review highlight key research gaps, particularly the need for more robust computational approaches that ensure scalability, fairness, and clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726454PMC12919550What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.