ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Predicting Chemotherapy-Related Symptom Deterioration Using Hybrid Deep Learning Architecture.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting symptom escalation in chemotherapy patients is essential for proactive intervention and improved clinical outcomes. This study leverages hybrid deep learning architectures, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks with Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM), to forecast the progression of 12 self-reported symptoms, categorized into physical (e.g., nausea, fatigue, pain) and mental (e.g., anxiety, cognitive impairment, mood changes) groups. The dataset consists of daily self-reported symptom logs from individuals undergoing chemotherapy. Given the high class imbalance-where 84% of cases showed no escalation-symptom data were aggregated into intervals of 3 to 7 days to improve predictive performance and temporal resolution. The CNN-LSTM model combines convolutional layers for extracting patterns within a local time window with LSTM layers for capturing long-term temporal dependencies. The model was trained using five-fold cross-validation to ensure robustgeneralization. Results indicate that 5-day intervals yielded the highest predictive accuracy for physical symptom prediction, with the CNN-LSTM model achieving an accuracy of 83%, precision of 89%, recall of 86%, F1-score of 88%, and an AUCof 83%. These findings highlight the effectiveness of hybrid deep learning architectures in symptom monitoring and early detection, enabling AI-driven decision support for real-time clinical interventions. Integrating these models into digital health systems could facilitate continuous symptom tracking, enhance predictive accuracy, and improve the quality of care for chemotherapy patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726450PMC12919592What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.