Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41726449›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

Knowledge Engineering for Medical Vocabularies Using Large Language Models.

Hsin Yi Chen, Anna Ostropolets, Chunhua Weng, George Hripcsak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hsin Yi ChenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Anna OstropoletsDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Chunhua WengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
George HripcsakDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical vocabularies are essential tools for capturing, classifying, and analyzing healthcare data. However, the creation and maintenance of these vocabularies are often labor-intensive and costly. This preliminary study evaluates the feasibility of using large language models (LLMs) to automate three key tasks in medical vocabulary management: term similarity, subsumption, and grouping. Using 1,533 cardiovascular terms from SNOMED CT, we applied GPT-4o and assessed the performance of 3 elementary tasks against OHDSI standardized vocabularies. While LLMs demonstrated high precision across tasks (0.78 for term similarity, 0.74 for term subsumption, 0.78 for term grouping), recall was notably lower (0.41 for term similarity, 0.08 for term subsumption, 0.52 for term grouping), indicating gaps in coverage. Overall, LLMs show promise for medical vocabulary tasks but require further refinement for clinical specificity and completeness. Future work should focus on enhancing recall, reducing hallucinations, and evaluating scalability across broader terminology sets.

Indexed as

Large Language ModelsNatural Language ProcessingSystematized Nomenclature of MedicineVocabulary, ControlledHumans

Identifiers

PMID41726449
PMCPMC12919453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.