ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Explainable Suicide Phenotyping from Initial Psychiatric Evaluation Notes Using Reasoning Large Language Models.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reasoning, Contrastive, and In-Context Strategies for Opioid Use Stage Detection on Social Media.Proceedings of the ... Workshop on Patient-Oriented Language Processing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical phenotyping is the process of extracting patient's observable symptoms and traits to better understand their disease condition. Suicide phenotyping focuses more on behavioral and cognitive characteristics, such as suicide ideation, attempt, and self-injury, to identify suicide risks and improve interventions. In this study, we leveraged the latest reasoning models, namely 4o, o1, and o3-mini, to perform note-level multi-label classification and reasoning generation tasks using previously annotated psychiatric evaluation notes from a safety-net psychiatric inpatient hospital in Harris County, Texas. Compared with the previously finetuned GPT-3.5 model, the out-of-box reasoning models prompted with in-context learning achieved comparable and better performance, with the highest accuracy of 0.94 and F1 of 0.90. We implemented novel clinical justification generation from these models on the traditional classification tasks. This finding marked a promising direction for performing clinical phenotyping that is interpretable and actionable using smaller, efficient reasoning models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726447PMC12919457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.