Building a Consumer Health Informatics Introductory Course Consensus Curriculum: An eDelphi Study.

Olivia F Krol, Khaya Clark, Vishala Mishra, Sriram Iyengar, Christie Martin, Katherine Blondon, Ruchi Thanawala, Julie Doberne

Abstract read

PubMed Full text at PMC

In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olivia F KrolOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Khaya ClarkVeterans Affairs National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland, OR, USA.

Vishala MishraDuke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA.

Sriram IyengarUniversity of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Christie MartinUniversity of Minnesota School of Nursing, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Katherine BlondonUniversity Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, GE, Switzerland.

Ruchi ThanawalaOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Julie DoberneOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health technology is becoming increasingly sophisticated and prevalent in modern healthcare. Consumer health informatics (CHI) introductory courses provide a baseline proficiency on this important topic, yet there are no standardized competencies for graduates. In the rapidly evolving digital technology landscape, clear competencies are particularly crucial, as content may shift rapidly. We developed core competencies for introductory graduate level CHI courses utilizing the eDelphi method. To conduct this study, we explored literature and current teaching methods to identify themes among CHI, created of a panel of experts to serve on our advisory panel, then systematically solicited expert feedback using an iterative process. Our preliminary results have identified several areas experts deem as integral to any consumer health informatics curriculum - defining CHI and its applications, understanding how health literacy and numeracy influence design, and analyzing how information platforms can influence consumer outcomes and decision making.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformaticsCurriculumConsensusHumans

Identifiers

PMID41726442

PMCPMC12919527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.