ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Right Patient, Right Specialist, Right Time: Retrieval Augmented Generation for Specialty Referral Routing.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We present an embedding-based retrieval system that automatically directs physician clinical questions to the most relevant specialist-curated question template, which is necessary for the specialist to provide a clinically relevant response. The system utilizes MPNet, a transformer-based model, to generate dense vector representations of both clinical queries and 24 predefined clinical templates. Given a clinical question, the system computes cosine similarity between the query and template embeddings to retrieve the most relevant matches. When validated against real-world, retrospective eConsults across five specialties, the system accurately identified the most relevant template in 87% of cases (success@1) and included it in the top three results 99% of the time (success@3). Automating specialty selection and clinical question referrals reduces the administrative burden on physicians, minimizes care delivery delays, and improves specialist responses by providing proper context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726438PMC12919621What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.