Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41726426›Full record

Observational studyAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

When Patients Go to "Dr. Google" Before They Go to the Emergency Department.

Michael A Grasso, Alexandra Rogalski, Naveed Farrukh, Anantaa Kotal, Enrique Calleros

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael A GrassoUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alexandra RogalskiUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Naveed FarrukhThe Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio.
Anantaa KotalUniversity of Texas, El Paso, Texas.
Enrique CallerosUniversity of Texas, El Paso, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately one-third of adults search the internet for health information before visiting an emergency department (ED), with 75% encountering inaccurate content. This study examineshow such searches influence patient care. We conducted an observational study of ED visits overa 12-month period, surveying 214 of 576 patients about pre-ED internet use. Data on demographics, comorbidities, acuity, orders, prescriptions, and dispositions were extracted. Patients who searched were typically younger, healthier, and more educated. Most used a general search engine to ask symptom-related questions. Compared to non-searchers, they were less likely to receive lab tests (RR 0.78, p=0.053), imaging(RR 0.75, p=0.094), medications (RR 0.67, p=0.038), oradmission (RR 0.68, p=0.175). They were more likely to leave against medical advice (RR 1.67, p=0.067) and receive opioids (RR 1.56, p=0.151). Findings suggest inaccurate health information may contribute to mismatched expectations and alter ed care delivery.

Indexed as

Emergency Room VisitsEmergency Service, HospitalInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetSearch EngineAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID41726426
PMCPMC12919500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.