ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Technology and Human Support Systems in Decentralized Studies: A Participant-Centered Case Study in Cystic Fibrosis.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the integration of informatics into clinical research reshapes the landscape of decentralized studies, optimizing participant experience remains a key challenge. Although prior research has established foundations for decentralized study design, a more comprehensive understanding of participant perspectives is essential to ensure remote methods for data collection meet participant needs. This study contributes to a growing literature in participant-centered decentralized studies through an analysis of OUTREACH, a 3-month home spirometry study among individuals with cystic fibrosis. Through a qualitative analysis of 46 participant exit interviews, we identified three overarching categories that influenced participant experience: motivators, technological infrastructure, and human coordination. Our findings emphasize the value of reliable technology and comprehensive interpersonal support systems. These findings shed light upon the importance of sociotechnical elements for optimizing participant experience, which may enhance the quality of clinical study data through meaningful participant engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41726402PMC12919454What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.