ArticleJAR life2026
A six-week balance training intervention with older inmates improves static balance in a German prison.
Article in JAR life, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of an Equine-Assisted Riding Program on Motor Performance, Movement Quality, and Well-Being Among Young Inmates.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Given the accelerated aging processes and elevated fall risk associated with functional decline in correctional settings, developing effective exercise programs for older inmates is increasingly important. Methods: This study examined the potential effects of a six‑week balance‑training program on static and dynamic balance performance, well‑being, and enjoyment of physical activity among older inmates in an open German prison. Ten male inmates (mean age = 62.1 ± 4.4 years) participated, with five assigned to an intervention group and five to a control group. The intervention comprised three 60‑minute sessions per week. based on a standardized balance‑training protocol for older adults. A repeated‑measures design assessed pre‑ and post‑intervention changes in anthropometric data, static balance, static balance on unstable surfaces, dynamic balance, well‑being, and physical activity enjoyment. Results: The training group showed significant improvements in static balance and static balance on unstable surfaces, corresponding to functional gains of approximately 26% and 33%, respectively. Dynamic balance, well‑being, and enjoyment of physical activity did not change significantly. Discussion: The observed improvements in static balance suggest that even limited interventions may yield meaningful physical benefits in older inmates. However, the absence of effects on dynamic balance and psychosocial outcomes may reflect the short intervention duration, small sample size, and ongoing stressors inherent to incarceration. Future studies should extend program length and include follow‑up assessments to evaluate long‑term benefits. Conclusion: A short, resource‑efficient balance‑training program was associated with improved balance performance in older inmates and may help preserve mobility, autonomy, and quality of life in aging prison populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.