ArticleJournal of ophthalmic & vision research2026
Corneal and Ocular Aberrations: A Comparative Study of Hyperopic, Emmetropic, and Myopic Eyes.
Article in Journal of ophthalmic & vision research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate differences in corneal and ocular aberrations between hyperopic, emmetropic, and myopic eyes. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 84 eyes from 84 healthy participants (age range 18-35 years), who were equally divided into three refractive error groups of hyperopia, emmetropia, and myopia. Following comprehensive optometric examinations, corneal and ocular aberrations were measured using Pentacam and Zywave imaging systems, respectively. Aberrations were measured for a pupil diameter of 5 mm. Root-mean-square (RMS), Zernike coefficients, and compensation factor (CF) between total ocular and corneal aberrations were calculated for statistical analysis. Results: The mean spherical equivalent was +1.96 Conclusion: Hyperopic eyes showed a higher RMS value for ocular fifth-order and corneal coma aberrations compared to the emmetropic and myopic eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.