Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41726354›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine2026

A Prospective Comparative Study of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement by Ultrasonography vs Computed Tomography Scan for the Detection of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Acute Neurological Emergencies.

Prabakaran Parameswaran, Balaji Venkatachalam, Thamarai Selvi, Naveen Selvaraj, Srinivasan Ravi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Indirect Assessment of Intracranial Pressure by Measuring the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter is Unreliable as Long as Interfering Factors are Disregarded.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prabakaran ParameswaranDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0751-1714
Balaji VenkatachalamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4879-9849
Thamarai SelviDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4047-1494
Naveen SelvarajDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Rela Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1368-7916
Srinivasan RaviDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8452-8897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is essential to manage patients with acute neurological emergencies to improve outcomes. Non-invasive modes of monitoring are preferred over invasive as they are associated with fewer complications. Our study aimed to compare optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement using ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography (CT) in patients with raised ICP. Patients and methods: After ethical committee approval and applying inclusion criteria, 140 patients were included in the study. Optic nerve sheath diameter was measured using ultrasound by the physician on admission into the critical care unit before initiation of anti-edema measures in whom ICP rise was suspected. It was compared with ONSD measurement obtained via CT using electronic calipers by a neuroradiologist. Evidence of ICP rise was identified using CT scan findings. Optic nerve sheath diameter measurements were taken twice in both the right and left eye each using ultrasound and CT scan to overcome inter-observer variability. Results: A total of 150 patients were screened and 10 were excluded as they met exclusion criteria. The mean age (years) of the participants was 55.27 ± 14.90. The mean (SD) of ONSD (mm) (USG) was 4.97 (0.74). The mean (SD) of ONSD (mm) (CT) was 5.07 (0.71). Based on CT findings, 65.7% of the participants had evidence of raised ICP. At a cut-off of ONSD (mm) (CT) ≥5, it predicts raised ICP with a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 73%. At a cut-off of ONSD (mm) (USG) ≥4.825, it predicts raised ICP with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 56%. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance of ONSD (mm) (CT) and ONSD (mm) (USG) in the receiver operator curve. Conclusion: Ultrasonography-guided ONSD measurement is comparable with CT-guided ONSD measurement in patients with raised ICP in patients with acute neurological emergencies. Non-invasive intracranial pressure monitoring can be reliably utilized to manage acute neurological emergencies. How to cite this article: Parameswaran P, Venkatachalam B, Selvi T, Selvaraj N, Ravi S. A Prospective Comparative Study of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Measurement by Ultrasonography vs Computed Tomography Scan for the Detection of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Acute Neurological Emergencies. Indian J Crit Care Med 2026;30(1):50-55.

Indexed as

Cerebral perfusion pressureComputed tomographyIntracranial pressureNeurological monitoringOptic nerve sheath diameterTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID41726354
PMCPMC12920349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.