ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2026
Differential response to ofatumumab in anti-AChR and anti-MuSK positive myasthenia gravis patients: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ofatumumab (OFA), a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, shows potential in myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibody against acetylcholine receptor (AChR-Ab), but comparative efficacy across AChR and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) subtypes remains uncharacterized. Objectives: To evaluate OFA's clinical and immunological effects in AChR-MG versus MuSK-MG, identify predictors of minimal symptom expression (MSE), and explore the dynamics of B-cell repopulation. Design: A retrospective study in a single center. Methods: Twenty-one refractory MG patients (13 MuSK+, 8 AChR+) received individualized OFA induction (Regimen 1: two 20 mg doses ⩾2 weeks apart; Regimen 2: single 20 mg dose) and maintenance (20 mg upon CD19 + B counts ⩾5 cells/μL repopulation or clinical exacerbation). Outcomes included time-to-MSE, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS) dynamics, prednisone reduction, and serial immunophenotyping (B-cell activating factor (BAFF), a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), soluble CD40L (sCD40L), microphage migration inhibitory factor (MIF), and immunoglobulin). Results: MuSK-MG achieved faster MSE (median time: 6 vs 15 months, log-rank Conclusion: OFA demonstrates superior efficacy in MuSK-MG with distinct immunological modulation. AChR-MG requires combinatorial strategies targeting compensatory pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.