ArticleIndustrial psychiatry journal
Psychological predictors of positive affect and meaningful work: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Industrial psychiatry journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Positive affect (PA)-encompassing emotions such as joy, interest, and alertness-and the experience of meaningful work (MW) are vital to psychological well-being. While both have been widely studied as individual outcomes, their shared psychological foundations remain underexplored. Two constructs central to this process are differentiation of self (DoS), the ability to maintain a clear sense of identity while staying emotionally connected to others, and cognitive-emotional regulation (CER), the capacity to manage emotions effectively, especially under stress. Although DoS and CER have shown relevance in clinical populations, their role in fostering Positive affect (PA) and the experience of meaningful work (MW) in healthy adults is not well understood. Given the rise in emotional burnout and the growing pursuit of meaning in work, there is a need to identify psychological traits that sustain emotional vitality and purpose. Aim: To investigate the role of differentiation of self and cognitive-emotional self-regulation in positive affect and meaningful work among adults. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 62 healthy adults aged 20 to 45 years were assessed using standardized psychological measures: the Differentiation of Self Inventory, the Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire, the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, and the Work and Meaning Inventory. Statistical analyses, correlation, regression, mediation analysis and one-way ANOVA was used. Results: Significant correlations were found among DoS, CER, PA, and MW. DoS and CER were significant predictors of both PA and MW. PA and MW showed a reciprocal predictive relationship, where each reinforced the other. Catastrophizing mediated the relationship between DoS and NA. Self-employed individuals scored higher on MW and positive refocusing. Conclusion: The psychological constructs of differentiation of self and cognitive-emotional regulation play an important role in fostering positive affect and a sense of meaningful work. These constructs can be used in therapy to enhance well-being and satisfaction with work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.