Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41726243›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2026

Integrated machine learning and positive matrix factorization for the source-specific contamination and predictive risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in multi-land-use soils around an active coal mine.

Zahid Bashir, Deep Raj, Rangabhashiyam Selvasembian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zahid BashirDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Sciences, SRM University-AP Amaravati Andhra Pradesh 522240 India Zahidbashir5175@gmail.com deepraj2587@gmail.com rambhashiyam@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0490-0774
Deep RajDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Sciences, SRM University-AP Amaravati Andhra Pradesh 522240 India Zahidbashir5175@gmail.com deepraj2587@gmail.com rambhashiyam@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-1511
Rangabhashiyam SelvasembianDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Sciences, SRM University-AP Amaravati Andhra Pradesh 522240 India Zahidbashir5175@gmail.com deepraj2587@gmail.com rambhashiyam@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0306-6753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigating the distribution, sources, and risks of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in mining-impacted soils is critical for effective environmental monitoring and human health protection. However, traditional assessments often fail to integrate spatial, source-oriented, and predictive approaches limiting a comprehensive understanding. In this study, 120 soil samples were collected from five land-use types surrounding an active opencast coal mine in the Godavari Valley coalfields, India. Pollution indices revealed severe multi-metal contamination, with Co and Cd emerging as the most consistently enriched elements across land uses, while Zn showed pronounced but spatially restricted enrichment, particularly in coal mine soils. An integrated framework combining positive matrix factorization (PMF), machine learning, and geospatial analysis was developed to identify source-specific contamination patterns. A robust four-factor PMF solution identified mixed industrial-mining activities as the dominant source (∼49%) of contamination. A random forest (RF) model integrating soil properties, spatial variables, and PMF-derived source contributions demonstrated strong to moderate predictive performance (average

Identifiers

PMID41726243
PMCPMC12919393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.