Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41726224›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Multiscale modeling of graphene and carbon nanostructures: advances in atomistic, coarse-grained, and machine learning approaches.

Iman Najafipour, Santanu Chaudhuri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Iman NajafipourDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago Chicago 60607 IL USA inaja@uic.edu santc@uic.edu.
Santanu ChaudhuriDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago Chicago 60607 IL USA inaja@uic.edu santc@uic.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4328-2947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene, its derivatives such as graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide, and related carbon nanostructures including carbon nanotubes, possess exceptional mechanical, thermal, and electronic properties. These features make them highly attractive for applications ranging from energy storage and filtration to flexible electronics and biomedical systems. Molecular simulation methods, including atomistic molecular dynamics, coarse grained modeling, and dissipative particle dynamics, have become essential tools for investigating the behavior of these materials at multiple length and time scales. This review presents recent advances in the modeling of graphene-based systems, highlighting how different simulation techniques are employed to explore mechanical deformation, defect evolution, thermal transport, and interfacial behavior. Special attention is given to the development of coarse-grained models, the role of force field selection, and the integration of machine learning to improve computational efficiency and predictive accuracy. Future directions include the use of high-performance computing, artificial intelligence assisted simulations, and scalable frameworks for large scale modeling. Overall, molecular simulations continue to play a critical role in the rational design and optimization of graphene-derived materials for advanced technological applications.

Identifiers

PMID41726224
PMCPMC12921473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.