ArticleAnnals of maxillofacial surgery
Knotless Suture for Primary Wound Closure Following Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars - A Comparative Study.
Article in Annals of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Surgical extraction of impacted third molars is a common procedure in maxillofacial surgery. Wound closure is typically achieved using knotted sutures, which require time and may lead to knot-related complications. Knotless sutures, widely used in various surgical fields, offer potential benefits for intraoral applications. This study evaluated the clinical utility of knotless sutures following third molar surgery. Materials and Methods: A randomised split-mouth clinical study was conducted on 29 patients undergoing bilateral mandibular third molar removal. Each patient received two types of sutures: knotless polyglyconate barbed sutures and control group: knotted polyglactin 910 sutures. Parameters assessed included suturing time, pain and discomfort during suturing (via Visual Analogue Scale) and post-operative outcomes on day 7, soft tissue healing (Modified Landry Index), wound dehiscence, facial swelling and maximum interincisal opening. Results: The knotless group showed significantly reduced suturing time and lower pain and discomfort scores. Improved soft tissue healing and reduced wound dehiscence were observed compared to the control group. No significant difference was found in facial swelling or mouth opening between the groups. Discussion: Knotless sutures are effective for intraoral wound closure after third molar extraction. They reduce operative time, minimise patient discomfort and enhance wound healing, offering a viable alternative to conventional knotted sutures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.