SynthesisFrontiers in robotics and AI2026
Deep learning-based robotic cloth manipulation applications: systematic review, challenges and opportunities for physical AI.
Synthesis in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cloth unfolding and folding are fundamental tasks in autonomous robotic cloth manipulation as Physical AI. Driven by recent advances in deep learning, this area has developed rapidly in recent years. This review aims to systematically identify and summarize current progress in deep learning-based cloth unfolding and folding. Following the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, 41 relevant papers from 2019 to 2024 were selected for analysis. We examines various factors influencing cloth manipulation and find that, while current methods show impressive performance, several challenges remain unaddressed. These challenges include irregular cloth sizes and diverse initial garment states. Concerning datasets, there is a need for improved real-world data collection systems and more realistic cloth simulators, and the Sim2Real gap must be carefully considered. Additionally, the review highlights the importance of incorporating multi-modal sensors into current platforms and the emergence of novel primitive actions that enhance performance. The need for more consistent comparison metrics is emphasized, and strategies for addressing failure modes are discussed to further advance the field. From an algorithmic perspective, we reorganize existing learning methods into six learning and control paradigms: perception-guided heuristics, goal-conditioned manipulation policies, predictive and model-based state representation methods, reward-driven reinforcement learning over primitive actions, demonstration-driven skill transfer methods, and emerging large language model-based planning methods. We discuss how each paradigm contributes to unfolding and folding, their respective strengths and limitations, and the open problems that arise. Finally, we summarize the remaining challenges and provide future perspectives for physical AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.