ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
Use of a Novel, Self-Expanding Coronary Sinus Reducer to Treat Symptomatic Epicardial and Microvascular Ischemic Heart Disease: Preclinical and First-in-Human Experience.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A novel self-expanding, recapturable, repositionable hourglass nitinol-mesh coronary sinus reducer (CSR) has been designed to improve symptoms in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) or with obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD). We report the preclinical and first-in-human experience with a novel self-expanding CSR. Methods: Twelve symptomatic patients (mean age 66.8 years, 58% men) with either CMD (n = 6) or obstructive CAD (n = 6) were treated with the A-FLUX CSR. Patients were followed up at approximately 1, 3, and 6 months to assess safety and symptom improvements (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] angina class and Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ]). Tissue healing responses were evaluated following A-FLUX CSR implantation in 7 mini-swine with coronary sinus angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Histological evaluation was performed at 3 and 6 months. Results: Eleven of 12 clinical patients were successfully implanted; 1 procedure was aborted due to challenging coronary sinus anatomy. There were no procedural device-related adverse events. From baseline, a significant improvement in CCS class (3 [3-3] vs 1 [1-1]; Conclusions: The A-FLUX CSR demonstrates preclinical and clinical procedural safety coupled with promising short-term clinical efficacy in persistently symptomatic patients with both CMD and obstructive CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.