ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2026
Analysis of Short-term Outcomes of Pancreatic Resections from a Low Volume Centre in a Tier II City in India.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer surgery represents the holy grail of hepatobiliary surgery and is the only option of curative treatment for malignancies involving this particular organ. This study aims to analyse the short-term outcomes of across the spectrum of surgeries performed for pancreatic neoplasms at a low volume hepatobiliary centre in eastern India. This is a retrospective study from our centre, from 1st January 2019 to 31st October 2024. Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained surgical database and electronic medical records, and data was collected from Electronic Medical Records. We identified 41 patients who underwent surgical resections during the study period. Median age was 56 years. Pre-operative biliary drainage was required in 24 (58.5%) cases. Pancreatico-duodenectomies represented with majority of cases (87.8%), followed by distal pancreas resections (2.4%), total pancreatectomy (2.4%) and ampullectomy (2.4%). Minimally invasive approach was attempted in 2 patients (4.9%). Post-operative complications and their incidences were post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) 26.8%, chyle leak 9.7%, biliary leaks 7.3%, delayed gastric emptying 19.4%, post pancreatectomy haemorrhage 4.8%, bowel-related complications 7.3, and surgical site infection 9.8%. Significant post-operative morbidity occurred in 24.4% of cases. Perioperative mortality rate was 7.3%. Although a low volume centre, our results are comparable to published literature for low volume centres, though worse than high volume centres. Safe outcomes are achievable at low volume centres with trained and dedicated surgeons, anaesthesiologists and proper patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.