ReviewCentral European journal of urology2025
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of neoplastic lesions of the urinary bladder.
Review in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy and perfusion monitoring for bladder involvement in relapsed multiple myeloma: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cystoscopy remains the gold standard of diagnosis and follow-up for bladder cancer (BC); however, it is an invasive procedure associated with discomfort and potential complications. Contrastenhanced ultrasound (CEUS) emerges as an alternative, utilizing real-time assessment of tumor vascularization and perfusion. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate its diagnostic performance for BC detection. Material and methods: MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection and Embase databases were queried through July, 2024. We included studies reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS for the detection of BC. Results: Out of 883 individual records, we identified 6 reports of prospective and retrospective studies, comprising 894 patients. The included studies indicate that CEUS demonstrates high diagnostic sensitivity, and specificity in discriminating malignant from benign bladder tumors. Moreover, CEUS has been shown promising performance in the preoperative prediction of tumor grade and stage, offering diagnostic capabilities comparable to well-established non-invasive imaging techniques. Conclusions: Our findings support the utilization of CEUS as adjunct to existing BC diagnostic protocols. It represents an alternative for BC diagnosis and could benefit patients contraindicated for conventional imaging modalities or at high-risk of cystoscopy-related complications. Scant amount of standardized, large-scale, prospective, comparative investigations are available, thus further research is necessary to validate the clinical utility of CEUS in BC detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.