Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725972›Full record

ReviewCentral European journal of urology2025

Is hospitalization still necessary? A systematic review of outpatient HoLEP over the last decade.

Gabi Shokaier, Anan Hussein, Tarek Taha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabi ShokaierDepartment of Urology, Emek Medical Center Afula, Israel.
Anan HusseinDepartment of Urology, Emek Medical Center Afula, Israel.
Tarek TahaDepartment of Urology, Ziv Medical Center Tsfat, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is a well-established, size-independent surgical intervention for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Traditionally performed with overnight hospitalization, there is increasing interest in same-day discharge to reduce healthcare costs and improve patient satisfaction. This systematic review evaluates the feasibility, safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of HoLEP as an outpatient procedure across all patient populations between 2015 and 2025. Material and methods: A systematic search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, yielding 15 eligible studies including over 1,500 patients. Outcomes analyzed included same-day discharge rates, readmissions, complications, symptom improvement, and patient satisfaction. Subgroup analyses examined outcomes by age, comorbidities, prostate size, and anticoagulation status. Results: Same-day discharge (SDD) rates ranged from 60-90%, with contemporary studies achieving rates above 85% in unselected populations. Readmission rates were low (~2-5%), with no significant increase compared to inpatient care. Complication profiles were similar between outpatient and inpatient settings, with most being minor. Functional outcomes such as International Prostate Symptom Score and urinary flow rates showed marked improvement postoperatively, comparable to traditional HoLEP. Advanced laser technology, early surgery scheduling, and standardized post-anesthesia protocols were key facilitators. Cost analyses demonstrated per-case savings of $750-$840 with outpatient care. Older age and anticoagulation were not absolute contraindications for SDD when proper criteria were met. Conclusions: HoLEP can be safely and effectively performed as an outpatient procedure in most patients, offering comparable outcomes to inpatient care while reducing costs and enhancing patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

ambulatory surgerybenign prostatic hyperplasiacost-effectivenessday-caseHoLEPoutpatient surgerypostoperative outcomessame-day discharge

Identifiers

PMID41725972
PMCPMC12924062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.