Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725969›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2025

Predicting extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success with a machine learning nomogram: A pilot study.

Jan Svihra, Peter Svihra, Igor Sopilko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jan SvihraJessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin, Slovakia.
Peter SvihraCERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Igor SopilkoJessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, Martin, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this pilot study was to develop and validate a machine learning (ML)-based clinical nomogram to predict the success rate of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for kidney stones, optimizing patient selection and treatment outcomes. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of ESWL data in all nephrolithiasis patients was performed from January 2018 to September 2022. Age, gender, stone size, stone area, stone location inside the kidney, stone density, skin-to-stone distance (SSD), stent presence, hydronephrosis presence, complications, and number of ESWL procedures were analysed. Inclusion criteria were a single kidney stone, stone size 5 mm to 20 mm, stone density less than average 1000 HU according to a native CT scan, and an adult patient. Statistical analysis was performed using the T test, mean, and standard deviation, and the calculations were processed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 25.0 with statistically significant values indicated by p <0.05. Python programming language was used to test machine learning models based on the previous study data. The scikit-learn library was used as a source of different ML models. Results: 102 patients fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were 70 male and 32 female patients. The mean age was 54.1 ±13.2 years, mean stone size 9.1 ±3.1 mm, stone area 47.3 ±30.8 mm Conclusions: Using machine learning we have introduced the nomogram predicting single treatment success rate of an ESWL procedure. The application of this ML-nomogram in clinical practice enables the nomogram to continuously improve and refine its outputs as new data become available.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceESWLmachine learningnomogramrenal stone

Identifiers

PMID41725969
PMCPMC12924075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.