Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725966›Full record

ReviewCentral European journal of urology2025

Leiomyosarcoma of lower urinary tract: Literature review.

Layla Settaf-Cherif, Michał C Czarnogórski, Adam Ostrowski, Wojciech Flis, Maciej Socha, Przemysław Adamczyk, Julia Drewa, Jan Adamowicz, Kajetan Juszczak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Layla Settaf-Cherif *Department of Urology and Andrology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Michał C Czarnogórski *Department of Urology and Andrology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Adam OstrowskiDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Wojciech FlisDepartment of Perinatology, Gynecology, and Gynecologic Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Maciej SochaDepartment of Perinatology, Gynecology, and Gynecologic Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Przemysław AdamczykDepartment of Urology, Department of General and Oncologic Urology, Nicolaus Copernicus Hospital, Torun, Poland.
Julia DrewaDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Jan AdamowiczDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.
Kajetan JuszczakDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) of the lower urinary tract (LUT) is a rare and aggressive malignancy derived from smooth muscle cells. It most commonly arises in the bladder, is less frequent in the prostate, and exceptionally rare in the urethra. The disease typically affects adults around the sixth decade of life with a slight male predominance. Etiology remains unclear, although previous radiotherapy or exposure to specific chemotherapeutic agents has been implicated. Clinical presentation is often nonspecific and may resemble more prevalent urinary tract diseases, contributing to delayed or inaccurate diagnosis. Material and methods: This narrative review summarizes current knowledge on LUT LMS based on available case reports and small case series. The literature was analyzed with focus on epidemiology, clinical features, diagnostic methods, and treatment strategies to highlight challenges in management and areas requiring further investigation. Results: Diagnosis of LUT LMS relies on histopathological assessment supported by immunohistochemistry, typically demonstrating positivity for smooth muscle markers such as smooth muscle actin, desmin, h-caldesmon, and vimentin. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment. Radical cystectomy is the most common approach for bladder tumors, while prostatic and urethral involvement often necessitates extensive surgical resection. The effectiveness of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is uncertain, and their use is tailored to individual tumor characteristics and patient condition. Regardless of location, prognosis is generally poor due to biological aggressiveness and frequent late presentation. Conclusions: LUT LMS is an extremely rare malignancy with limited evidence available to guide management. Further research, including multicenter databases and prospective studies, is needed to establish prognostic factors and optimize treatment. Multidisciplinary collaboration is essential to ensure timely diagnosis, appropriate therapeutic planning, and improved patient outcomes.

Indexed as

immunohistochemistryleiomyosarcomaLUTLUTSpathology

Identifiers

PMID41725966
PMCPMC12924069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.