ArticleCentral European journal of urology2025
Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy with the Hugo-RAS system: Initial experience, surgical outcomes, and learning-curve assessment.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a standard approach for nephron-sparing surgery. The Hugo-RAS system is an emerging platform, but data on its outcomes and learning curve are limited. This study evaluates the safety, efficacy, and learning curve of RAPN using Hugo-RAS in a high-volume laparoscopic center. Material and methods: We analyzed 42 consecutive RAPN cases performed with the Hugo-RAS system from May 2023 to October 2024. Perioperative outcomes, renal function, and the learning curve were assessed. The primary endpoint was the "trifecta" (warm ischemia time <25 min, negative surgical margins, and no major complications). Learning curve analysis used Cumulative Sum Control Chart (CUSUM) methodology. Results: The median console time was 88 minutes (IQR: 74-107), with a docking time of 5 minutes (IQR: 240-420s). The trifecta rate was 83.3%, and no conversions occurred. Docking proficiency was achieved by the 5 Conclusions: The Hugo-RAS system allows for safe and effective RAPN with a rapid learning curve. Surgeons adapt quickly, achieving proficiency within a short number of cases. Further studies are needed to validate long-term outcomes and broader applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.