Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725916›Full record

ArticleCraniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction2026

Over a Decade of Maxillofacial PEEK Patient-Specific Innovation: A Retrospective Review of the Evolution from In-House Craft to Virtual Design and Remote Manufacturing.

Nicholas J Lee, Gareth Honeybone, Mohammed Anabtawi, Mathew Thomas, Sachin M Salvi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas J LeeSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Glossop Rd, Broomhall, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK; nicholas.lee@nhs.net (N.J.L.); sachin.salvi@nhs.net (S.M.S.).
Gareth HoneyboneSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Glossop Rd, Broomhall, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK; nicholas.lee@nhs.net (N.J.L.); sachin.salvi@nhs.net (S.M.S.).
Mohammed AnabtawiLeeds Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George St, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2295-7853
Mathew ThomasUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Uttoxeter Rd, Derby DE22 3NE, UK.
Sachin M SalviSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Glossop Rd, Broomhall, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK; nicholas.lee@nhs.net (N.J.L.); sachin.salvi@nhs.net (S.M.S.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-4987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maxillofacial skeletal reconstruction presents significant challenges due to anatomical complexity, functional requirements, and aesthetic demands. Traditional materials such as titanium and autogenous bone grafts have limitations, prompting interest in Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), a versatile thermoplastic polymer with advantages like biocompatibility, radiolucency, and elasticity similar to human bone. This multi-year case series evaluates the clinical outcomes of PEEK implants used in 56 cases on 53 patients for maxillofacial reconstruction, primarily for trauma (44 patients) and deformity (9 patients). PEEK implants were applied to various facial regions including the orbit, zygoma, mandible, and maxilla. The majority of surgeries utilised virtual surgical planning. Patient-specific implants were fabricated using 3D imaging technologies, allowing customisation for optimal fit and functionality. The mean patient age was 37 years with a split of 37 to 16 females. Some complications were noted such as infection and paraesthesia. However, the majority of patients experienced positive outcomes. The findings support PEEK implants as a safe, effective, and adaptable material for maxillofacial surgery, with potential for further advancements in material properties and surgical technologies to improve long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

bespoke maxillofacial prosthesisfacial deformityinterlockingonlayPEEKpolyetheretherketone

Identifiers

PMID41725916
PMCPMC12922131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.