ArticleJournal of causal inference2026
Discovery of critical thresholds in mixed exposures and estimation of policy intervention effects.
Article in Journal of causal inference, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regulations of chemical exposures often focus on individual substances, neglecting the amplified toxicity that can arise from multiple concurrent exposures. We propose a novel methodology to identify critical thresholds in multivariate exposure spaces and estimate the effects of policy interventions that limit exposures within these thresholds. Our approach employs a recursive partitioning algorithm integrated with targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) to discover regions in the exposure space where the expected outcome is minimized or maximized. To address potential overfitting bias from using the same data for threshold discovery and effect estimation, we utilize cross-validated TMLE (CV-TMLE), which ensures asymptotic unbiasedness and efficiency. Simulation studies demonstrate convergence to the optimal exposure region and accurate estimation of intervention effects. We apply our method to synthetic mixture data, successfully identifying true interactions, and to NHANES data, discovering harmful metal exposures affecting telomere length. Our approach provides a flexible and interpretable framework for policy-makers to assess the impact of exposure regulations, and we offer an open-source implementation in the CVtreeMLE R package.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.