ArticleSleep medicine research2025
Discrepancies Between Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Sleep: Potential Marker for Mild Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Sleep medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Like Taking Part in Star Wars": Qualitative Study Using Thematic Analysis to Explore the Acceptability and Experiences of Older Adults Participating in Remote Longitudinal Sleep and Dementia Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- ERP Biomarkers of Auditory-Visual Distraction in Aging and Cognitive Impairment.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Sleep Trajectories in Amnestic and Non-Amnestic MCI: Longitudinal Insights from Subjective and Objective Assessments.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Objective: Discrepancies between objective and subjective evaluations of sleep efficiency have been observed in individuals with pathological and healthy aging. Objective sleep evaluation using actigraphy has been proposed as a potential tool for the clinical assessment of mild cognitive impairment. Methods: Habitual sleep at home was evaluated using actigraphy (objective measure) and sleep diaries (subjective measure) in 45 participants (between 28- and 72-years-old). Participants were divided into four groups by age and by diagnosis (mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disorder). Cognitive and sleep measures were analyzed for comparisons and correlations. Results: Significant discrepancies between objective and subjective sleep efficiency were observed in healthy and pathological ages. The MCI group showed the lowest sleep efficiency compared to other groups. Correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship between cognitive impairments and sleep efficiency in MCI and AD groups. Conclusions: Objective sleep evaluation, with a particular focus on sleep efficiency, should be considered as a potential marker for MCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.