Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725865›Full record

ArticleAnnals of pediatric cardiology

Challenges in managing pediatric heart failure, especially in resource-limited settings.

Lamk Kadiyani, Sivasubramanian Ramakrishnan

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of pediatric cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lamk KadiyaniDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sivasubramanian RamakrishnanDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pediatric heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome with high morbidity, characterized by distinct epidemiological profiles globally. While congenital heart disease and cardiomyopathies predominate in developed regions, rheumatic heart disease and delayed surgical interventions drive the burden in low- and middle-income countries. This review elucidates the unique pathophysiology of pediatric HF, which differs significantly from that of adult HF in terms of developmental cardiac physiology, molecular signaling, and maladaptive ventricular remodeling. Diagnosis remains challenging due to nonspecific symptoms and the limitations of adult-derived classification systems and biomarkers. Management strategies are evolving beyond traditional regimens, and clinicians are increasingly adopting the "four-pillar" therapies, including Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. However, pediatric-specific evidence remains limited compared to adult data. Notably, the recent PANORAMA-HF trial showed that sacubitril/valsartan was similarly effective to enalapril but did not achieve statistically superior outcomes in children. For end-stage HF, ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation are critical, though donor shortages persist. Furthermore, pulmonary artery banding has re-emerged as a surgical strategy to induce left ventricular recovery in young children with dilated cardiomyopathy. Given the disparity in outcomes and the reliance on extrapolated adult data, there is an urgent need for large-scale, pediatric-specific clinical trials to optimize global management strategies.

Indexed as

Angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitorsbeta blockersheart failure in childreninfantsneonatessodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID41725865
PMCPMC12924027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.