Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41725833›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2026

Evolving Consultation: Enhancing Ophthalmic Diagnostic Performance Using Large Language Model.

Taiga Inooka, Hikaru Ota, Yosuke Taki, Sayuri Yasuda, Ai Fujita Sajiki, Ayana Suzumura, Hideyuki Shimizu, Jun Takeuchi, Ryo Tomita, Taro Kominami and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Taiga InookaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hikaru OtaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yosuke TakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Sayuri YasudaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Ai Fujita SajikiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Ayana SuzumuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hideyuki ShimizuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Jun TakeuchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryo TomitaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Taro KominamiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroaki UshidaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kenya YukiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Koji M NishiguchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Artificial intelligence-powered large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied in health care. However, studies in ophthalmology assessing whether LLMs can improve the accuracy of complex differential diagnoses in clinical cases, or which levels of clinical experience benefit most from their use, remain lacking. This study assessed the effectiveness of ChatGPT-4o, an LLM-driven chatbot, in enhancing ophthalmologists' clinical reasoning using original scenarios. Design: Prospective study. Subjects: Ten original ophthalmic clinical scenarios with open-ended questions were developed, covering the following subspecialties: oculoplastic and orbital disease, glaucoma, inherited retinal disease, macular disease, neuro-ophthalmology, ocular surface, pediatric ophthalmology, retinal vascular disease, strabismus, and uveitis. Methods: Responses to each clinical scenario were collected from 20 ophthalmologists (10 residents and 10 board-certified ophthalmologists) and ChatGPT-4o. Ophthalmologists subsequently revised their answers with assistance from ChatGPT-4o. All responses were anonymized and independently evaluated by 3 attending ophthalmologists based on 4 metrics: coherency, factuality, comprehensiveness, and safety (each on a 5-point scale). Main Outcome Measures: The median total scores for each group in coherency, factuality, comprehensiveness, and safety (maximum of 15 points each). Results: Assistance from ChatGPT-4o significantly improved evaluation scores for coherency, comprehensiveness, and safety among both residents and board-certified ophthalmologists (all, Conclusions: ChatGPT-4o effectively enhanced diagnostic reasoning and response quality, particularly among ophthalmology residents. However, successful integration into clinical education and practice requires careful management of increased variability in factuality and safety. This issue could be addressed by implementing strategies such as advanced retrieval-augmented generation systems to ensure the provision of accurate and safe clinical information. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical decision support systemsLarge language modelsMedical educationProblem solving

Identifiers

PMID41725833
PMCPMC12919258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.