ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Results from a Phase I Extension Study of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor in Patients with Macular Telangiectasia Type 2.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To primarily assess long-term safety and retinal imaging outcomes of NT-501 (revakinagene taroretcel-lwey), which releases ciliary neurotrophic factor into the vitreous over an extended time, for treating macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel). Design: Phase I, nonrandomized, multicenter, open-label extension study. Participants: Six participants with bilateral MacTel who completed the parent 60-month phase I study. Methods: In the parent study, participants had NT-501 surgically implanted in the study eye. The eye with more advanced disease was determined to be the study eye. For the purposes of this extension study, the fellow eye provided untreated natural history data. The extension study included visits 72, 84, 96, and 108 months postimplantation. Main Outcome Measures: Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the proportions of eyes with ≥10- or ≥15-letter loss in BCVA from baseline. Retinal imaging variables included change from baseline in ellipsoid zone (EZ) (inner segment/outer segment) area loss and proportion of study eyes with ≥35% increase from baseline in EZ area loss. Results: All implants were retained through the final study visit. All ocular treatment-emergent AEs were mild to moderate; none resulted in study discontinuation. No study eyes had ≥15-letter loss in BCVA from baseline at any study visit. Similarly, no study eyes had ≥10-letter loss at months 72, 84, and 96; 1 study eye (17%) experienced it at month 108. The portion of study eyes with a ≥35% increase in EZ area loss from baseline was lower (range, 50%-60%) relative to fellow eyes (range, 75%-100%). Conclusions: Over the 9-year follow-up period, NT-501 was well tolerated and safe. Further studies are ongoing to investigate the long-term efficacy of NT-501 for treating MacTel. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.