ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2026
Real-world study of use patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome initiating oral decitabine and cedazuridine or intravenous/subcutaneous hypomethylating agents.
Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health-system burden of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes in England: a literature-based micro-cost analysis.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Real-world study of use patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome initiating oral decitabine and cedazuridine or intravenous/subcutaneous hypomethylating agents.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Decitabine and cedazuridine (DEC-C) is the only oral hypomethylating agent (HMA) approved for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the United States. The other HMAs approved for MDS, decitabine and azacitidine, are administered intravenously (IV) or subcutaneously (SC). Objectives: This study examined real-world outcomes among MDS patients treated with oral DEC-C compared to IV/SC HMAs. Design: Adult patients diagnosed with MDS who received HMAs as their first treatment on or after July 1, 2020 through February 2024 in ConcertAI's RWD360 Methods: We used propensity score matching (PSM) to balance potential confounders. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was utilized to compare real-world overall survival (rwOS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-free survival, and time to next treatment (rwTTNT) among patients treated with oral DEC-C and IV/SC HMAs. Results: A total of 2101 patients with MDS were included, with 405 treated with oral DEC-C and 1696 treated with IV/SC HMA. After PSM, there were 399 patients in each treatment group; demographic and clinical factors were well balanced. Patients treated with oral DEC-C had a similar median rwOS (22.7 months vs 19.5 months; Conclusion: This real-world study is the largest to date to examine clinical outcomes among MDS patients who initiated oral DEC-C compared to IV/SC HMAs. While study results indicate comparable rwOS and AML-free survival among patients treated with oral DEC-C or with IV/SC HMAs, patients treated with oral DEC-C had a significantly longer rwTTNT. These findings support the use of oral DEC-C as an alternative to parenteral HMA therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.